Skip to main content
Technology Comparison

RTK vs PPK vs Static GNSS: Survey Method Comparison

An expert comparison to help you choose the right equipment for your project.

Feature RTK GNSS PPK GNSS Static GNSS
Accuracy ±1-2cm ±1-2cm ±3-5mm
Processing Real-time Post-process Post-process
Connection Required Not required -
Speed Fast Delayed Slow
Setup Base required Flexible -
Option A Various

RTK GNSS

Real-Time Precision

RTK provides centimeter accuracy in real-time for immediate results.

Pros

  • Immediate results
  • Real-time QC
  • Fast workflow
  • Proven accuracy

Cons

  • Base/network needed
  • Range limited
  • Signal required

Best For

StakeoutConstructionImmediate verification
Option B Various

PPK GNSS

Post-Processed Precision

PPK achieves same accuracy as RTK through post-processing.

Pros

  • No real-time link
  • Same accuracy
  • More flexible
  • Works anywhere

Cons

  • Delayed results
  • Post-processing
  • No real-time QC

Best For

Drone mappingRemote areasFlexible workflows
Option C Various

Static GNSS

Maximum Precision

Static observation provides maximum accuracy for control networks.

Pros

  • Maximum accuracy
  • Sub-centimeter
  • Network adjustment
  • Control quality

Cons

  • Very slow
  • Post-processing
  • Control only

Best For

Control networksMaximum accuracyMonument work

Our Expert Verdict

Depends on Your Needs

RTK for real-time, PPK for flexibility, static for maximum accuracy.

Choose RTK GNSS if...

Choose RTK for real-time results and construction stakeout.

Choose PPK GNSS if...

Choose PPK for drone mapping and remote area flexibility.

Choose Static GNSS if...

Choose static for control networks and maximum sub-centimeter accuracy.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do I need all three methods?

Most firms use RTK daily, PPK for drones, and static for control. It depends on project types.

Need Help Choosing?

Our experts can recommend the right equipment for your specific project requirements.

Licensed & Insured
1hr Response