Skip to main content
Technology Comparison

SLAM vs Static Scanning: Mobile vs Tripod-Based 3D Capture Methods

An expert comparison to help you choose the right equipment for your project.

Feature SLAM Scanning Static Scanning
Method Continuous motion Station-based
Speed 10-20x faster Moderate
Accuracy 10-30mm 1-3mm
Setup Walk and scan Tripod per scan
Service Pricing Equipment: $30,000-$150,000 Equipment: $40,000-$200,000
Option A Mobile Technology

SLAM Scanning

Walk-and-scan mobile capture for fast documentation

SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) scanning uses continuous motion capture for rapid area documentation.

Pros

  • Much faster capture
  • Large area coverage
  • No tripod setup
  • Natural workflow

Cons

  • Lower accuracy
  • Drift accumulation
  • Less point density

Best For

Large facilitiesQuick documentationAs-built surveys
Option B Tripod-Based Technology

Static Scanning

Station-based scanning for survey-grade accuracy

Static scanning uses tripod-mounted scanners for maximum accuracy and point density at each station.

Pros

  • Survey-grade accuracy
  • High point density
  • Proven reliability
  • Control point integration

Cons

  • Slower capture
  • More setups required
  • Tripod access needed

Best For

Survey projectsBIM modelingQuality documentation

Our Expert Verdict

Depends on Your Needs

SLAM for speed and coverage, Static for accuracy and density.

Choose SLAM Scanning if...

Choose SLAM when speed matters more than millimeter accuracy.

Choose Static Scanning if...

Choose Static when precision is critical for engineering work.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can SLAM replace static scanning?

For many applications yes, but survey-grade work still needs static accuracy.

Need Help Choosing?

Our experts can recommend the right equipment for your specific project requirements.

Licensed & Insured
1hr Response